A

 

 

Attorneys focused on real property, environmental and business law

 

THE SMITH FIRM

1541 Corporate Way, Suite 100

Sacramento, CA  95831

Tel: (916) 442-2019

Fax: (916) 442-0220

 

manager@thesmithfirm.com

 

[ Home ] Practices ] Resources ] Online ]

CONTACT US FOR A FREE FIRST CONSULTATION

The Smith Firm offers attorney services focusing on real property, environmental and general business law. Emphasizing personal contact with clients, we help to avoid litigation by early legal understanding. When litigation is necessary, we practice it competently. Call for a free initial legal consultation. Use the online form day or night to get detailed legal advice right away.

Here's what we've done for clients recently:

  • Our client, a small restaurant, was "stuck up" by a professional plaintiff's Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) complaint. We got the case thrown out of federal court on a summary judgment for lack of standing.
  • Our client, a "mom and pop" dry cleaner, was responsible for ground and water contamination. We worked with environmental consultants to reduce costs while assuring that regulators were quickly satisfied.
  • Obtained resolution for our clients in property title disputes. Several clients have had former "partners" or relatives demand a cut of the property value because they lived in the place for any given period. These are often bogus, extortionist claims that should be dealt with aggressively.

We believe our responsibility is ultimately to the legal system and the Final Judge. So we hew to strict standards of honesty and fairness while providing zealous, competent and affordable representation of our clients. If you are that kind of client, we're your kind of attorney.

 

Legal Developments & Events

Real property: The evidence was insufficient as a matter of law to establish a real estate development company's claim of inverse condemnation based on interference with the right of access, which arose from a city's diversion of truck traffic in a manner that allegedly interfered with access to the company's business park. At most, the traffic backups required tenants of the business park to use an entrance that was less convenient, and although access to the business park might have been circuitous and slow because of the volume of traffic, there was nevertheless a reasonable means of ingress and egress at all times. Border Business Park, Inc. v. City of San Diego. (September 26, 2006)

Environmental: California state agencies' plan to convert farmland to wetland wildlife habitat under Williamson Act conservation easement, including major grading, ponding and long-term maintenance, was not exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act's requirements of environmental review. Class 13 categorical exemption under CEQA focuses on preserving land in its natural state; Class 4 pertains to minor modifications to land only. Nor did the project qualify for the "common sense" exemption for no possible environmental impact. California Farm Bureau et al. v. California Wildlife Federation et al. (September 21, 2006) 

Get More Legal UNDERSTANDING IN OUR BLOGS:

Smith on California Property: comments on California real property law for real California people in real situations.

Smith on California Integrated Waste Management: Commentary on the state and future of California solid waste, recycling and related policy, law and practices.

Smith on Environmental Law: musing on the state and development of environmental law, the federal acts and California's state acts in particular.